Uzbekistan Insurance Company Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Uzbekistan Insurance Company - Case Study ExampleHowever a person may also be interested in his former wife/husband where ties of affection and care gallop to exist 3 The fact that Vicky called Dave to set right the faulty wiring even off after their decouple would prove that at that place existed cordial relationship between them signifying existence of insurable interest. However as a matter of abundant precaution, it is advised that confidential enquires must be made rule out the inappropriate chances of Daves intention to kill her in a seemingly accidental fire collectible to faulty wiring, ahead settling his claim.Secondly Daves claim for the damage to the kinfolk out-of-pocket to the fire can not be entertained for the following reasons.The fire form _or_ system of government is a contract of indemnity unlike a life judgment of conviction policy. In contract of indemnity, insurable interest must be present both at the time of conclusion of contract as well as at the time of occurrence of the insured event. In this trip, because of the confirmed ownership of the house in Vickys name and because of their divorce, Dave did not have insurable interest on Vickys life. Further because his wiring was faulty and his negligence contributed to the loss and even if he had had insurable interest, he is not eligible for claim on the damage to the house.The second case is regarding Brian who dies opus surfing apparently cod to drowning confirmed by the presence of wet in the lungs in post mortem. The fact that he over-exerted himself while jogging can be attributed as a contributory negligence and hence the claim of his lawyers for 20, 000 motif not be colonised provided there are provisions in the personal accident policy to that effect.An injured persons failure to exercise due care, which along... Uzbekistan Insurance CompanyThree questions arise for considering the claims of Dave 1) Whether he has insurable interest on Vickys life even after their divorce2) Whether death of Vicky was caused by his mephistophelean design under the pretext of accidental fire and 3) Whether he has insurable interest on the house and whether his negligence in wiring disqualifies him from making the claim.The second case of Brian need not be settled because of his contributory negligence though his lawyers can claim for relief due to comparative negligence. The third case of Heathers death due to hospitals ineffective cleaning though she had been admitted due to allergy which she had not disclosed in the proposal, her husbands can be settled at higher premium rate with proportionately reduced centre assured since it would be too harsh to reject the claim on two counts. One even if she had stated the allergic condition, only higher premium would have applied and two, the death was not due to allergy.The second case is regarding Brian who dies while surfing apparently due to drowning confirmed by the presence of water in the lungs in post mortem. The fact that he over-exerted himself while jogging can be attributed as a contributory negligence and hence the claim of his lawyers for 20, 000 need not be settled provided there are provisions in the personal accident policy to that effect.An injured persons failure to exercise due care, which along with another persons (the defendants) negligence, contributed to the injury.